Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01704
Original file (PD 2012 01704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

 

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY 

CASE NUMBER: PD1201704 SEPARATION DATE: 20030617 

BOARD DATE: 20130129 

 

 

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty PVT/E-4 (99/Basic Trainee), medically separated for 
chronic left foot pain due to left navicular stress fracture. The CI received injuries during basic 
combat training, 29 October 2002 and was put in a medical hold status and was returned to 
military training on 14 February 2003. Soon after his return he was complaining of left foot 
pain and bone scan demonstrated stress fracture of the left navicular bone. The CI could not be 
adequately rehabilitated with treatment to meet the physical requirements of his Military 
Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent 
L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other 
conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the chronic 
left foot pain due to left navicular stress fracture condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with 
application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no 
appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating. 

 

 

CI CONTENTION: “Feeling medium discomfort when walking long distances & standing for a 
long time.” 

 

 

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined 
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the 
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings 
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The conditions chronic left foot pain as 
requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; 
and, is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or 
otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration 
by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. 

 

 

RATING COMPARISON: 

 

Service IPEB – Dated 20030529 

VA – All Effective Date 20030618 

Condition 

Code 

Rating 

Condition 

Code 

Rating 

Exam 

Chronic Left Foot Pain due 
to Left Navicular Stress 
Fracture 

5099-5003 

0% 

Status Post Left Navicular Stress 
Fracture 

5299-5284 

10% 

STR 

.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. 

0% X 1 

STR 

Combined: 0% 

Combined: 10% 



 

 

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit 
and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions, 
compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s 
career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The DES 
has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity 


or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for conditions 
determined to be service-connected by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) but not 
determined to be unfitting by the PEB. However, the DVA, operating under a different set of 
laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected 
conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the 
Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time. The Board’s role is 
confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB 
rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of 
separation. 

 

Chronic Left Foot Pain Due to Left Navicular Stress Fracture Condition. The CI developed a stress 
fracture of the right fibula during basic training. Although this healed, pain developed in the 
left midfoot and bone scan, obtained 17 March 2003, suggested stress fractures of the left foot 
navicular bone. The CI was treated with unsustained improvement in the left foot pain. At the 
MEB/narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation, 8 May 2003, a month prior to separation, the CI 
reported minimal discomfort when ambulating with civilian shoes, but pain with military boots. 
On physical examination, mild tenderness to palpation was present over the left mid foot. No 
swelling or deformity was reported and arch of the foot was normal. Range-of-motion (ROM) 
of the foot was normal without pain or crepitus. No VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) 
examination was performed. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based 
on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 0% code 5003, minimal and occasional 
pain, citing the Army pain policy. The VA rated the condition using Army MEB examination 
10%, code 5282 foot injury, moderate, citing the mild tenderness on examination. Under this 
code, a higher rating of 20% requires moderately severe findings, not supported by the 
evidence in record. The Board noted the mild tenderness of the left midfoot, without crepitus, 
deformity or swelling; the absence of pain on orthopedic movement, and normal ROM; and the 
ability of the CI to ambulate without discomfort in civilian shoes. The Board unanimously 
agreed that that the foot condition did not rise to a 10% disability under §4.59 or §4.40. The 
Board was unable to find any pathway to a higher rating under any applicable VASRD code. 
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable 
doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the 
PEB adjudication for the left foot condition. 

 

 

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB 
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating left foot condition was operant in this case and 
the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the 
left foot pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change 
in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for 
consideration. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of 
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: 

 

UNFITTING CONDITION 

VASRD CODE 

RATING 

Chronic Left Foot Pain Due to Navicular Stress Fracture 

5009-5003 

0% 

COMBINED 

0% 



 

 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120720, w/atchs 

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record 

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 

 

 

 

 

 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF 

 Acting Director 

 Physical Disability Board of Review 

 


SFMR-RB 


 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency 

(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 

 

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation 
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130003919 (PD201201704) 

 

 

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of 
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the 
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, 
I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. 

This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of 
Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision 
by mail. 

 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 

 

 

 

Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 Deputy Assistant Secretary 

 (Army Review Boards) 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00967

    Original file (PD2011-00967.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bones as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The condition pes planus as requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting conditions of bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bones. In the matter of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01747

    Original file (PD-2014-01747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Chronic Pain, Left Foot Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01938

    Original file (PD-2013-01938.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20050208VA -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Stress Fractures, Bilateral Navicular Bone5003-528310%Left Foot Navicular Bone Stress Fracture528410%STR5003-528310%Right Foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00184

    Original file (PD-2014-00184.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Bilateral Thighs, Ankles, and Feet5099-500310%Chronic Right Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Chronic Left Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Bilateral Pes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01412

    Original file (PD-2013-01412.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Foot Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the right foot condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01267

    Original file (PD2012 01267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was medically separated for multiple stress reaction conditions.The CI reported an onset of foot pain 4 weeks into basic training in 2001, followed by pelvic and hip region pain that did not respond adequate to anti-inflammatory medication and physical therapy (PT)to meet the physical requirements of her MOS or satisfy physical fitness standards. The PEB combined the multiple lower extremities at 20% as noted above, and the VA adjudicated that the conditions were healed without sequelae...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00728

    Original file (PD-2012-00728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. Left tibial stress fracture with bilateral femoral stress reactions.” The L3 profile listed “bilateral lower leg stress fractures.” The commander’s statement indicated complaints of leg pains, noted “stress fractures in both lower legs” without improvement following being “sent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00032

    Original file (PD2013 00032.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Physical examination showed joint swelling of the right knee, but not of the left knee. The record was otherwise silent about ankle symptoms until the MEB separation exam in April 2001, at which time the CI noted "arthritis" of the ankle.Because of right foot pain and normal foot X-rays, a nuclear medicine study was performed in April 2001 and revealed mild right ankle findings consistent with stress or degenerative changes.The commander's statement was silent regarding the occupational...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01998

    Original file (PD-2013-01998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pain medication required.” *VARD dated 25 July 2008 rated Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, right ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, left ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and retained a 30% rating using code 5299-5276 for bilateral pes planus and plantar fasciitis (previously evaluated as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction bilaterally, plantar fasciitis bilaterally) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s information...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01100

    Original file (PD2012 01100.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted.The PEB adjudicated “bilateral foot and tibial pain”as a single unfitting condition, rated 0%,under criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. Members first deliberated if the bilateral foot and bilateral tibial conditions were reasonably justified as separately unfitting. In the matter of the servicecombined bilateral tibial and bilateral foot conditions, the Board by a...